Object Title

Flintlock muzzle-loading musket - Gillmore's Pattern

Flintlock muzzle-loading musket - Gillmore's Pattern


about 1815

Object Number



Old Tower Collection

Physical Description

The lockplate is flat with bevelled edge and stepped down at the tail with a pronounced teat. Raised and rounded integral pan with flash guard which is secured by a small screw into the plate behind the pan and by the steel screw. The cock is flat with a bevelled edge, ring-necked and quite full-breasted in profile, being rather shorter in height than is typical. The plate is engraved in script ahead of the cock. Stocked to 3.5 in of the muzzle with brass fore-end cap. Bayonet stud beneath barrel. Iron blade on block braised 3 inches from the muzzle. The barrel is retained by two wide round pins and the upper sling loop screw. Three brass India Pattern rod pipes, button-head cupped tip rod. One lockscrew with circular brass cup. Brass scroll trigger guard with lower swivel loop through front of guard. Buttplate similar to New Land but slightly longer tapering tang. Slightly undercut comb. The round barrel is fitted with a break-off breech and has a tapering flat on the top of the barrel. The base for a special tangent backsight, now missing, is braised 7.25 in ahead of the breech. Underneath the breech are stamped proofmarks of 'London Gunmakers Company', and the maker's mark W.F. possibly William Fullerd.





BarrelLength39 in.
BarrelLength991 mm
OverallLength54.5 in.
OverallLength1384 mm
OverallWeight3.85 kg
OverallWeight8.5 lb


Serial Number None visible


.64 in

Inscriptions and Marks

Lieu Gillmore 3rd W.I. Reg
Plate, ahead of the cock
London Gun Makers Company over the Maker's name, W.F.
Underneath the Breech.
The initials W.F, possibly William Fullerd.
Underneath the Breech



This gun was made for Joseph Albert Gillmore, 3rd West Indies Regt., in 1815, by Forsyth & Co, at a cost of £40. The object was to use a special cartridge in which the ball is encased in a cup or wad, there by eliminating windage in the common musket and increasing accuracy while in no way slowing down the loading process. It would also be possible to reduce the powder charge as it would be properly consumed by the elimination of windage. The weapon was over-refined and because it would not use the 14.5 to the pound ball of the standard musket ( but instead one of 18 to the lb), and had a complicated backsight, it was rejected. Gillmore was given a commendation and £60 to cover his expenses.

Formerly XXIV.48